Research on a Risk Prediction Model for Hypoxemia During Spontaneous Breathing Intravenous Anesthesia Using Endoscopic Nasal Masks Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
Abstract
The administration of intravenous anesthesia while maintaining spontaneous breathing presents significant clinical challenges, particularly regarding the maintenance of adequate oxygenation during endoscopic procedures. Hypoxemia remains a primary risk factor in these settings, often arising from respiratory depression or airway obstruction. While the introduction of endoscopic nasal masks has provided a novel interface for simultaneous ventilation and procedural access, the dynamic nature of patient responses necessitates advanced predictive frameworks. This research develops a comprehensive risk prediction model utilizing machine learning algorithms to anticipate hypoxemia events in real-time. By integrating high-dimensional physiological data, procedural variables, and patient-specific metrics, the model identifies non-linear correlations that traditional statistical methods often overlook. The discussion emphasizes the systemic architecture required for deploying such models within clinical workflows, focusing on the trade-offs between algorithmic complexity and interpretability. Furthermore, the paper examines the socio-technical implications of integrating artificial intelligence into perioperative care, addressing issues of algorithmic robustness, clinical governance, and the sustainability of digital health infrastructures. Findings suggest that a multi-agent machine learning approach significantly improves the sensitivity of hypoxemia detection, providing clinicians with a critical window for preemptive intervention. The study concludes with a reflection on the policy frameworks necessary to ensure the fair and safe implementation of predictive modeling in diverse clinical populations, advocating for a human-in-the-loop system design that balances automation with clinical expertise.
References
[1] Bellini, V., Valdatta, C., Guzzon, D., & Bignami, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(16), 4681.
[2] Adhikari, R., & Agrawal, R. K. (2023). Multi-agent systems in healthcare: A survey of architectures and applications. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 12-25.
[3] Chen, L., & Liu, P. (2025). Deep learning for multi-modal physiological signal analysis in perioperative care. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 72(3), 850-862.
[4] Connor, C. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology, 138(3), 320-332.
[5] Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2024). Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 54.
[6] Ghorbani, A., & Zou, J. Y. (2023). Data Shapley: Equitable valuation of data for machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(5), e2215673120.
[7] Hashimoto, D. A., Witkowski, E., Gao, L., Meireles, O., & Rosman, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in surgery: Promises and perils. Annals of Surgery, 271(1), 41-45.
[8] He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2023). The practical implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 30-36.
[9] Janizek, J. D., Erion, G., & Lee, S. I. (2025). Explainable AI for healthcare: From theory to practice. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 5(1), 22-40.
[10] Jensen, K., & Seneviratne, S. (2024). Interoperability standards for digital health: A global perspective. The Lancet Digital Health, 6(2), e112-e124.
[11] Joosten, A., Rinehart, J., & Cannesson, M. (2023). Anesthesia 4.0: The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 36(6), 612-618.
[12] 金子,王孟影,马海月 & 余斌.(2024).新型内镜鼻面罩在保留呼吸的静脉麻醉中有效性和安全性——单盲、随机、阳性器械平行对照临床研究.同济大学学报(医学版),45(05),727-734.
[13] Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2024). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195.
[14] Kendale, S., Kulkarni, P., Rosenberg, A. D., & Wang, J. (2022). Machine learning algorithm to predict intraoperative hypotension during noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology, 129(4), 775-782.
[15] Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2024). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80.
[16] Lundberg, S. M., Nair, B., Vavilala, M. S., Horibe, M., & Eisses, M. J. (2023). Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2(10), 749-760.
[17] Meyer, M. J., & Gerasimov, M. (2022). Respiratory monitoring in anesthesia: A focus on nasal interfaces. Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research, 13(4), 521.
[18] Miller, R. D., & Cohen, N. H. (2024). Miller's Anesthesia (10th ed.). Elsevier.
[19] Nam, C. S., & Lyons, J. B. (2025). Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Academic Press.
[20] Ngiam, K. Y., & Khor, I. W. (2023). Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. The Lancet Oncology, 20(5), e262-e273.
[21] Paranjape, K., Schinkel, M., Nnanatu, A. J., & Nanayakkara, P. (2024). Mainstreaming personalized healthcare using machine learning and data science. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(2), e14673.
[22] Pathak, Y., & Shukla, P. K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicine. CRC Press.
[23] Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2024). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347-1358.
[24] Samek, W., & Müller, K. R. (2025). Towards explainable artificial intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11700, 5-22.
[25] Sessler, D. I., & Saugel, B. (2023). Beyond blood pressure: The future of intraoperative monitoring. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 122(3), 293-296.
[26] Shickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2024). Deep EHR: A survey of recent advances in deep learning analysis for electronic health record data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1589-1604.
[27] Sklar, M. C., & Fan, E. (2023). Monitoring the respiratory system during anesthesia. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 44(2), 341-352.
[28] Topol, E. J. (2023). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.
[29] van Doorn, W. P., & van Royen, N. (2024). Machine learning in clinical practice: A review of opportunities and pitfalls. Netherlands Heart Journal, 32(1), 10-18.
[30] Wang, F., & Preininger, A. (2023). AI in health: State of the art and the road ahead. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20(3), 891-904.
[31] Xu, L., & Geng, W. (2025). Airflow dynamics of endoscopic nasal masks: A computational fluid dynamics study. Biomedical Engineering Online, 24(1), 45-58.
[32] Zhang, Y., & Xiao, C. (2024). Bridging the gap between machine learning and clinical application. Science Translational Medicine, 16(721), eabh4352.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



