Machine Learning Models for Predicting Extreme Market Drawdowns

Authors

  • Philip Westbrook Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Northern Illinois University
  • Shawn Ellsworth School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Marcus L. Sterling Department of Economics and Finance, University of South Florida

Keywords:

Market Drawdowns, Tail-Risk Prediction, Financial Machine Learning, Algorithmic Governance, Socio-Technical Systems, Systemic Risk, Sustainability.

Abstract

Predicting extreme market drawdowns is a critical endeavor in financial risk management, as these tail-risk events possess the potential to destabilize global economies and erode decades of capital accumulation. Conventional econometric models, largely predicated on Gaussian assumptions and linear dependencies, often fail to capture the complex, non-linear dynamics and cascading feedback loops that precede catastrophic asset price declines. This research explores the systemic implementation of machine learning architectures for the anticipation of extreme drawdowns, prioritizing a holistic investigation of socio-technical infrastructures over narrow algorithmic optimization. We analyze the structural trade-offs between predictive accuracy and model interpretability, examining how deep learning and ensemble methods navigate the high signal-to-noise ratio inherent in financial time-series data. The paper further scrutinizes the requirements for large-scale deployment, including the physical infrastructure for real-time processing and the governance frameworks necessary to mitigate algorithmic bias and market reflexivity. Furthermore, we address the environmental sustainability of high-compute financial AI and the policy implications of widespread model convergence. By integrating perspectives from engineering, financial economics, and public policy, this work provides a comprehensive roadmap for the development of robust, fair, and resilient predictive systems designed to safeguard global financial stability in an increasingly volatile digital landscape.

References

1.Abadie, A. (2021). Using machine learning for volatility estimation and prediction. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 606-640.

2.Arratia, A. (2014). Computational Finance: An Introductory Course with R. Atlantis Press.

3.Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.

4.Tang, Y., Kojima, K., Gotoda, M., Nishikawa, S., Hayashi, S., Koike-Akino, T., ... & Klamkin, J. (2020). Design and Optimization of Shallow-Angle Grating Coupler for Vertical Emission from Indium Phosphide Devices.

5.Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. John Wiley & Sons.

6.Zhou, D. (2025, December). M-VP2: Microservice-Oriented Vulnerability Patch Planning-A Cost-Aware Approachusing Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In 2025 5th International Conference on Computer, Internet of Things and Control Engineering (CITCE) (pp. 248-254). IEEE.

7.Brock, W. A., Lakonishok, J., & LeBaron, B. (1992). Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1731-1764.

8.Qi, R. (2025, June). Enterprise financial distress prediction based on machine learning and SHAP interpretability analysis. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Finance (pp. 76-79).

9.Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

10.Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223-236.

11.Liu, T. (2026). Volatility Forecasting and Early-Warning Market Stress Detection: A Leakage-Safe Evaluation with Tree Ensembles and Transformers.

12.Devlin, J., et al. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.

13.Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253-263.

14.Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654-669.

15.Zhang, T. (2025). A Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Multimodal AI Framework for Intelligent Tax Data Integration and Compliance Enhancement. Frontiers in Business and Finance, 2(02), 247-261.

16.Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

17.Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), 2223-2273.

18.He, K., et al. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

19.Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.

20.Hull, J. C. (2021). Machine Learning in Business: An Introduction to the World of Data Science. Pearson.

21.Kim, S. (2017). Financial series prediction using attention-based LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01887.

22.Li, H., & Liu, T. (2023). Portfolio optimization based on the LSTM forecasting model. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis (Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 97-106).

23.Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.

24.Lim, B., & Zohren, S. (2021). Time-series forecasting with deep learning: A survey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194), 20200209.

25.Qi, R. (2025, June). Enterprise financial distress prediction based on machine learning and SHAP interpretability analysis. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Finance (pp. 76-79).

26.Yi, X. (2026). Trusted AI Commercialization Infrastructure for SMBs: A Unified Multi-Tenant Architecture Integrating Incentive Systems, Content Governance, and Standardized Recommendation APIs.

27.Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in Financial Machine Learning. John Wiley & Sons.

28.Makridakis, S., et al. (2018). The M4 Competition: Results, findings, conclusion and way forward. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(4), 596-608.

29.Paszke, A., et al. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

30.Yi, X. (2026). A Federated and Differentially Private Incentive–Marketing Framework for Privacy-Preserving Cross-Channel Measurement in AI-Powered Digital Commerce.

31.Rossi, G. (2018). Socio-Technical Systems and the Finance Industry. Routledge.

32.Schwartz, R., et al. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54-63.

33.Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.

34.Taylor, S. J. (2011). Asset Price Dynamics, Volatility, and Prediction. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-21 — Updated on 2026-03-26

How to Cite

Philip Westbrook, Shawn Ellsworth, & Marcus L. Sterling. (2026). Machine Learning Models for Predicting Extreme Market Drawdowns. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1). Retrieved from https://isipress.org/index.php/IJAIR/article/view/98